Get PRB E-mail News

Behind the Numbers: The PRB blog on population, health, and the environment

The PRB blog on population, health, and the environment

Authors

Obesity and Mapping U.S. “Food Deserts”

January 4th, 2011 | Posted in Income/Poverty

by Eric Zuehlke, editor

A few months ago, I wrote about the correlation between lower income levels and higher obesity rates for women in the United States. The link is dramatic: 36 percent of women in the lowest income group are obese compared with 16 percent in the highest income group. Much of the research on this issue has highlighted the role of the availability of healthy food in neighborhoods. Now, Slate has published a nifty interactive map showing county-level data on the percentage of people with no car who live more than a mile from the nearest supermarket. Without easy access to supermarkets, many rely on fast-food or convenience store options for meals. This gets to a central issue in the obesity problem in America: the preponderance of cheap, convenient, but unhealthy food.

You’ll notice a striking resemblance when you compare Slate’s map with this county-level map on obesity rates in the U.S. from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:

Map courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Does the map of “food deserts”  tell the whole story of why obesity has become so common in the United States? No. I presume that some of the counties with high proportions of people without a car and far from supermarkets are rural and very sparsely populated (like those in Nevada, New Mexico, and Arizona, for example), skewing the point since there are few supermarkets in these counties. By showing county-level data, the map ignores the unique challenges of poor inner-city populations. And of course access to fruits and vegetables at a local market alone won’t necessarily change eating habits. Putting in farmers markets in every neighborhood wouldn’t automatically make everyone healthier and solve the obesity problem.

But access to a variety of food options, including fresh produce and nonprocessed food, does make a difference. Living far from a supermarket and with no car will certainty limit one’s options for healthy food. In my article, Max Schmeiser at the University of Wisconsin-Madison made an important point about the deeper reason for the correlation between poverty and higher obesity beyond just lower income levels: “While at first pass income may seem like an important determinant of obesity, individual behaviors, as well as the means with which to carry out healthy behaviors, primarily drive the relationship between income and weight. I believe the issue of greater obesity among low-income families relative to higher-income families is primarily driven by differences in information on good nutritional behaviors, cooking knowledge, and availability or access to healthy food. Higher income families…tend to live in neighborhoods with good grocery stores, or have access to cars to go to good grocery stores.” According to Slate’s map, many people in counties with high obesity rates simply don’t have easy access to good grocery stores.


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Obesity and Mapping U.S. “Food Deserts””

  1. Eugenia Espejo Says:

    I do not believe that people with higher income could be more informed. It is an assumption, and not necessarily a given fact. The analysis about the relationship between lower income levels and higher obesity does not take into account that the people far away from groceries stores/or supermarkets do not have options for walking o taking a bus, which is something that has to be offer by the local/federal/goverments. In addition, buying in a supermarket also does not mean that the food available there is healthy or healthier than other places. Most of the food that is sold in the supermarkets comes out of a mass process which is negligent with final users. See for it the documentary, food inc.

    In sum, the analysis is attributing to individuals and their careless way of living and ignorance the problem, but the problem is structural, obesity, as chronic diseases, cancer, among others must be an issue that corresponds to the government give solutions for a better public health of all its citizens.

  2. Yat-Suen Poon Says:

    The analysis in no way suggests that low-income individuals are “careless” in their way of living. Ignorant, yes, but again it does not suggest that they are ignorant solely of their own choosing. Knowledge counters ignorance, but if adequate resources of that knowledge are not provided or available, then those individuals will not be able to “know better” than their higher-income counterparts, who tend to have greater access to those resources (and better options), which is the whole point of the above article.

Leave a Reply

 


Services: Get E-Mail News  ·  Join/Renew Membership  ·  Donate  ·  Bookstore  ·  Contact  ·  Español  ·  Français
Copyright 2007, Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved. • Privacy Policy
1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW • Suite 520 • Washington, DC 20009-5728 • USA
Phone: 800-877-9881 • Fax: 202-328-3937 • E-mail: popref@prb.org